Reviews

The staff and doctor here are all very welcoming, professional, smily, and easy to talk to. I didn't expect much from the moment I walked in their facility, but it is the bet experience I've ever had at an optometrist!!! Everyone should give them a try, you won't regret it! The office is SUPER clean and very bright. I am very impressed by their service, attitude, and the machines they use to do the exam. Will keep coming back to them!

Dr Jensen and the staff are very professional and truly care about their patients! My only complaint is that I cant get my glasses fast enough! Thank you all very much!

Dr Hatashita is the best. He spoke of ergonomics years before it became a topic of interest. Calibrated my VDT glasses with great accuracy for years before transitioning to progressives after retirement. Mellow office with excellent parking. Highly recommend.

Incredibly friendly staff, everyone was happy and matched my joking ever. Nathan was very professional while taking the photos of my eyes, Dr Tsang was patient with my weird questions about eyes and how things worked, and Evelyn was a blast to talk and joke with as I selected my frames and lenses. Thank you Queen Anne Vision Clinic! 6/5 stars for sure!

Dr. Patel, Theo, and Alex took great care of me. All the latest technology in a clean setting. And, they were able to use my insurance. Thanks!

Dr. Patel and her carefully chosen staff are how the doctor-patient relationship should be. All display great competence within an easy going atmosphere. Dr. Patel removed some very ripe cataracts from my eyes. The results are such that every morning I thank God for Dr. Patel. In my most unhumble opinion: Dr. Patel is a blessing along with being a great surgeon.

I've had a great experience visiting the office. Very friendly and accommodating front desk and nice and knowledgeable Doctor Stern. I was in and out in 30 minutes which included comprehensive eye exam and frame selection. Highly recommend this office.

The staff and Doctor were so nice! They went above and beyond to make sure that I knew my benefits. They found me the perfect set of glasses, which is difficult because I am very picky with sizes. I watched their interactions with other patients while I was there. I can highly recommend coming here.

I have been going to Dr. Chriqui and her crew for almost 15 years. I have been to other eye doctors in the past but never received as kind, thorough, precise treatment before. I really feel like I'm getting the best treatment and service around. My eyes feel better, my vision is the best ever and I'm given answers to my questions. I would go to them and give them the opportunity to show you the quality of their service. Also now there is an additional Dr. There who has the same quality and experience that Dr. Chriqui is looking for in the practice. I'm very happy to have found them 😊

I have just received a letter from dr. Berg’s lawyers threatening to sue me for my review. Therefore, I am going to restate the facts concerning my LASIK procedure by leaving out any personal consideration. I was evaluated by Dr. Murthy for LASIK as a corrective procedure of my nearsightedness, who stated that the risk with LASIK was only associated with the suction ring used during the surgery to keep your eye in place, as it puts pressure on the eye and can detach the retina. He then added that Dr. Berg did not use the suction ring and that I was good to have the procedure done with him. At my first visit, in August 2017, after doing several tests to asses if I was in fact a candidate, Dr. Berg stated that I was the perfect candidate and that I was going to have perfect vision. When I asked him about what dr. Murthy said of the suction ring, he replied that he had no idea why dr. Murthy said that, as he does use the suction ring, but he reassured me that the procedure would not affect my eye retina in any way. As a side fact, I also received a discount for being referred by dr. Murthy. So I had my procedure done at the end of August 2017. At the followup visit I informed Dr. Berg that my vision in the right eye was not good. He said it was okay. Three weeks later I started experiencing symptoms of a retinal detachment, so I got an appointment with Dr. Murthy. He looked at my retina and said that it was all good, and that he was going to see me in a year. I waited a couple more weeks, in which my symptoms continued to worsen, and then I decided to go see a different retina specialist. I had an extensive retina detachment and went into urgent eye surgery. I now have almost fully recovered from the buckle surgery, and I’m wearing corrective glasses as I’m left with -2.00 in the right eye. I also have difficulty wearing contact lenses now, as I’ve developed chronic dry eye disease following the LASIK procedure. Interesting fact: the “informed consent” that they had me sign does include retinal detachment among the risks associated with LASIK, and I quote “I understand that other very rear complications threatening vision include, but are not limited to, corneal swelling, corneal thinning (ecstasia), appearance of “floaters” and RETINAL DETACHMENT, hemorrhage, venous and arterial blockage, catara formation, total blindness, and even loss of my eye”. But Dr. Berg verbally stated that it is not true. And dr. Berg’s lawyers state in their letter that “The fact of the matter is injury to the retina is not a known risk of LASIK”. I must add that one retina specialist and two optometrist I have seen, said that my detachment could have indeed been caused by the suction ring. I will make these precise statements under oath if necessary.

Been a patient for 8 years. The doctor is competent and knowledgeable.